Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Potatodots's avatar

Well written. Thank you.

I'll reread and if I have any points I cannot refrain from trying to make, or further kudos, I will be back for further comment!

Expand full comment
Mike Perceval's avatar

Well David, you certainly stuck your hand in the hornets nest with this one, didn’t you?

BUT (Behold the Underlying Truth), I know it was not your intention to ‘aggravate the hornets’, but rather to attempt to retrieve a ‘pearl of great price’ that was surrounded by the nest. And I believe you did well in doing so. I’ll go further than that; I believe you were entirely in God’s will, and pleased Him in doing so - particularly in the gracious, yet unyielding, manner you went about it.

We are living in truly momentous times; times about which the Bible has much to say. But, for various reasons, the vast majority of the professing Church does not recognize, or misunderstands, that which is prophetic, in process of being, or yet to be fulfilled, and is highly relevant and imminently practical - and of tremendous importance - pertaining to our present lives.

As we are so obviously living in an emotionally-charged, easily offended, and highly contentious time, let me be clear; I’m not talking about ‘super-Christians’ vs ‘normal Christians’, ‘intelligent’ vs ‘ignorant’, some ‘secret knowledge’ only available to the deserving initiates, or many other charges that might so easily be thrown about. What I am talking about is, the ‘framework’, or ‘lenses’ through which one interacts with the Word of God, technically referred to as the ‘hermeneutic’, used to interpret the Scriptures.

There are, perhaps, many other factors that bear on the issues related to understanding the Word but, assuming a common denominator of born-again, Spirit-filled Christians, I believe this is the most critical factor. It is easily understood by analogy: Three such Christians with the same ‘eye problems’ go to different Optometrists, and are given differing prescriptions for corrective lenses. In the first case, the prescription corrects issues with far sight, but what is relatively close remains blurred or obscured. In the second case, what is near has become well-focused, but what is far remains distorted. And, in the third case, 20/20 vision results, allowing that individual to see and comprehend all that is within view - even if they don’t (yet) fully understand what they see is clearly there.

A corresponding analogy that I believe is helpful is that of a thousand piece puzzle. Let’s assume the same three persons, and their differing conditions as equivalent to being given the same such puzzle, but only one has all the pieces, while the other two lack a significant number; say, 25 to 30 percent, of the total. Only the person with the ‘complete’ set has any real chance of assembling the disparate elements into the cohesive whole that the puzzle maker intends be seen. The others may indeed put differing portions together correctly, but are missing other elements that might profoundly alter their final perspectives.

At any rate, it is clear from the subsequent engagement in the Comments that you were grappling with such issues in regard to the ‘right’ Biblical view of Israel vs the Church, and I want to commend you for the manner in which you ‘contended for the Truth’, without being ‘contentious’.

May the Lord continue to bless and make your efforts fruitful, for your good, along with that of His Church, and - above all, for His glory, and that of His Kingdom.

Love, Mike

Expand full comment
51 more comments...

No posts